No sooner had Robin van Persie penned his now infamous missive about the direction of his beloved Arsenal than the pundits began speculating on the future of Theo Walcott. The press love a good crisis at Arsenal. But after last season, a single star player leaving would hardly make news, let alone justify the use of broken canons. So the rumors began flying that Theo would follow RVP out the Emirates door. Throw in a dash of Uzbekistan mischief and you have a proper crisis just waiting to be dissected. Unfortunately for the doomsayers (or fortunately depending on how you rate the England winger), Theo Walcott isn’t going anywhere just yet.
There are a variety of reasons why I’m convinced that Theo won’t be leaving Arsenal this summer. But his emotions aren’t among them. Usually when people begin discussing these matters there’s a fair amount of pontification on the player’s loyalty to a manager or love for a club. However, I think we’ve seen several stark reminders recently that there is little love or loyalty that factors into a player’s decision making at contract time. So I’m not going to bother hypothesizing about Theo’s devotion to Arsene Wenger or Arsenal. Because when it’s all said and done, I don’t think either issue makes one bit of a difference.
The real reason Theo Walcott won’t leave Arsenal this summer is that there is nowhere for him to go. That’s not to say there aren’t clubs that would sign him. I’m sure there are plenty of clubs throughout Europe that would happily take the pacey winger on board. But we should be well aware by now that Theo is only going to leave Arsenal for a club that will pay him higher wages, and maybe offer him the chance at glory he can’t find at the Emirates. That rules out a lot of clubs in one fell swoop.
An obvious destination for Theo would be Liverpool. The reason I say it’s obvious is because Walcott was a childhood Liverpool supporter. Liverpool can probably offer similar wages to what Arsenal will offer, but can they really offer more? The reason I pose that question is because it will be the player’s primary consideration. If Liverpool could double Theo’s wages, like Man City can, then he might be tempted to join the Anfield club. But they cant. And Theo Walcott is not leaving Arsenal to make less money at a club that will not participate in the Champions League and has no chance of winning the Premier League in the foreseeable future. No amount of affection for Liverpool will cause him to make that decision. So I think we can safely rule them out.
If Liverpool aren’t a potential destination for Theo, and you rule out the smaller clubs further down their respective tables around Europe, then you’re left with only the mega-clubs. Now we’re talking about Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, Juventus, Milan, Inter and United. And of course there are the mega-money clubs like Chelsea, City and PSG. I can’t see Theo going to any of those clubs.
Chelsea have been rumored to want Theo at Stamford Bridge but that makes little sense. Look at some of the attacking players they have in their squad. Torres, Marin, Mata, Hazard, Malouda, Ramires. And it looks like Oscar and Hulk and a few others might be on the way. Hardly an outfit desperately in need of Theo’s talents.
Manchester City have even less need for Theo. Their strategy seems to be totally devoted to buying the biggest names from around Europe. While I still believe Theo can become a massive star, he’s hardly in Kun Aguero’s class. Are City going to risk a 160K/week contract on Theo with FFP fast approaching? I’d doubt it. It also seems a bit bizarre that City could have RVP, Nasri, Clichy, Toure, Adebayor and Theo on their books at the same time. I hate to point this out, but that collection of players didn’t exactly fill the trophy cabinet at Arsenal. So why would City want to collect them all at the Etihad. Again, it just doesn’t seem like a good fit.
I think we can also safely rule out United. First of all, Theo just doesn’t strike me as an Alex Ferguson type player. He’s also currently playing the same position as Valencia and Nani. It’s pretty easy to argue that both those players are better than Theo and United currently have a very hard time getting both those players enough playing time as it is. Adding Theo seems unnecessary and United have already added a flair player in Kagawa. Finally, there’s virtually no history of Fergie’s United doing business with Wenger’s Arsenal. (Silvestre never happened.)
Theo has proven to be at his best when he has space to operate. He’s a great counter-attacker but struggles when defenses park the proverbial bus. The pace of play in Spain is much slower than the Premier League and teams like Madrid and Barca face packed, deep-lying defenses on a weekly basis. Can anyone honestly see Theo playing tiki-taka at the Nou Camp? It’s laughable. Especially with the surfeit of talent they have at his position. And Madrid are are arguably even more complete.
Too much is made of the praise heaped on Theo ahead of Champions League clashes. Some fans have suggested that these accolades are evidence of how highly other teams rate him. But Theo’s an obvious choice for opposition praise because he has pace and pace scares defenders. He’s also an obvious choice because, as sad as it sounds, Arsenal don’t have many marquee players left. If you’re the opposition manager, and you want to praise an Arsenal player and call him a threat, other than Robin van Persie, which player are you going to choose? Theo is the next, most natural choice. And managers will often heap praise on players for whom they have no real affection.
Bayern Munich would be a potentially exciting place for Theo to ply his trade and they have the money to make it a reality. Furthermore, the pace of play in Germany is well suited to Theo’s game and there’s often a little more room to operate. But Bayern don’t even remotely have the need for Theo. At least not at this moment. On either flank they boast one of the best wingers in the world. Ribery is coming of another stellar season and Robben, for all his flaws, still has the ability to win games on his own (which is fitting because that’s precisely how he prefers to do it). Moreover, having already made some exciting signings this summer, and as one of the few clubs that is operated at a profit (gasp), Munich are highly unlikely to make Theo a high priority target.
Italy is an intriguing destination for Theo but I also think it’s unrealistic. Juventus have apparently tabled an 8 million Pound bid for RVP. If that’s their idea of an acceptable transfer fee for the Premier League player of the year, what will they consider appropriate for Theo? Whatever the figure, it’s hard to imagine it would be enough. Especially if they buy RVP. As for Milan or Inter, there’s been no suggestion that they are interested. Milan certainly don’t seem to need Walcott, and Inter won’t be playing in the Champions League this upcoming season, nor do they appear set to compete for trophies.
PSG is the one team in Europe that could afford to offer Walcott an immense wage increase and Champions League football while also arguably being much improved by his arrival. But there’s no denying that Ligue 1 is still a big step down from the glamour of the Premier League. For a player with a lot still to prove in order to be a regular starter for England, it’s hard to see him choosing a move to France.
Finally, there are two additional reasons I can’t see Theo making a big money move away from the Emirates. The first is his age. You could argue that this is the perfect time for a big money club to sign Theo. He’ll be turning only 24 years old this coming March. But as I just mentioned, he’s still mostly unproven. If he were to sign a 5-year contract with Arsenal this summer, he’d be just 27 entering the final year of that agreement. By that point he’d be approaching the “prime” of his career and be a much safer choice. Either he would have begun to realize his potential, or proved to be an over-hyped flash-in-the-pan. (Emphasis on “flash.”) If he had ascended to the level that some believe he can, that would be the perfect time for more moneyed clubs to make their bid.
The other reason I don’t see Theo leaving this summer is closely related to the point I just made. Theo isn’t as good as many Arsenal fans believe. At least not yet. I personally rate him highly and think he’s a great talent. But it would be ignorant to suggest that he’s one of the Premier League’s best attackers. As supporters we tend to overly adore or criticize our own players. Theo has been on both ends of that phenomenon. But in the cold light of day, I think most fans would agree that he still has to greatly improve his consistency and decision-making before he can truly be classed as one Europe’s best.
Finally, there’s the issue of what Theo wants. And Theo has made it clear that he wants to be a center forward. He might get that chance at Arsenal at some point. Then again he might not. But it’s pretty clear that no “big” club is going to take an somewhat unproven winger, sign him for huge money, then guarantee him a chance to play center forward. It’s impossible. It won’t happen. Not at Chelsea, City, United, Barca, Madrid, Munich, Milan, Juve, or even Liverpool. So if he truly wants to prove himself as a world-class talent, and have any chance whatsoever to play a few games at center forward, his only real choice is to stay at Arsenal. And that’s precisely what I expect he will do.
Poor Theo Walcott. It looks like he will have to stay at Arsenal where he is a regular starter for one of the world’s best clubs. He will have to play at one of the world’s best stadiums. He will have to live in one of the world’s best cities. And he will have to play in the world’s best league and compete in the champions league. And he will likely have to do all that with a new contract that will pay him a wage that few clubs in the world would offer.
Then again, maybe things are going to be okay for Theo after all.
Excellent post, well argued, I’m convinced
Valencia and Nani better than Theo??? that is laughable….and unlike arsenal other clubs don’t worry about what they have before they sign eg nasri was signed with silva, aguero,milner,tevez,johnson all there.
an you say chelsea has attacking fowards???? which chelsea do watch???? drogba is gone, torres is on holiday, uhhhhhh who else???
Very well said.I am one of those who don’t share a cry if he leaves.He has not improved a lot and I think the Ox will be a bettar assit to Arsenal
I do agree with Gooner4Ever that you may have undersold Theo vs Nani/Valencia. I agree MUFC have hi quality players already in the slot. (Though Nani is making rumblings and won’t suffer falling behind Valencia). So Theo is surplus to their needs.
But I am one of those who think Theo’s strengths drown his weaknesses if you compensate for them thru the rest of the team around him. And his strengths are more than a match for Nani/Valencia.
I also think that Arsenal and therefore Theo face more parked buses than MUFC. We have more possession and a slower build up. And as you kinda said, the 2 players the opposing manager focuses on to neutralize when they play us are: RvP and Theo. Stop them and you stop Arsenal – assists and goals.
Given the mountain he climbs each game, I think Theo does better than he’s given credit for.
And it should hopefully mean we take advantage this season on the other wing, more than last season. Pod/Gerv/Santos/Gibbs can all help pull some of the opposition resources to the left side and open up Theo’s side a little more.
Pingback: Arsenal’s Question of a Centre Forward « gunners' rock: where every game is an away game
Great blog. I’d add 1 more point to why he’ll stay. Theo has a few TOP strengths. And he has a number of glaring weaknesses. Wenger knows how to showcase his strengths and when Theo is having a “bad” game, Wenger keeps faith in him till it’s Theo time against the weakening, tiring opposition. Wenger rarely yanks Theo and always starts him. If I were Theo I would be scared of being misused/misunderstood at another club with another manager, regardless of being promised the start. Take away the opportunity for Theo to use his strengths and you have possibly the weakest footballer in the league.
Theo, stick with what works for you, and stick with he who knows how to make it work.
Nice write up…sounds convincing…Hopefully, Theo stays. We need all our best players for next season…We are stronger with them…
Great blog, well put. Regardless of MUs other options…could you imagine his speed with the way they counter attack?? Yikes. Sometimes wish we did more of it (i.e. Chelsea thrashing) Re-Sign him up Arsene hahaha
Great article. I was going to do more or less the same piece on my blog today, but now have nothing to write about. Damn you!
While this is a very smart post, and all the points are well argued, not sure Theo or the people around are going to to reason this clearly. I hope for his sake that they and he are a bit wiser than the grumblings and rumour make them out to be. Theo’s technical skills are adequate for the demands of the EPL. Don’t see how they would transfer all that well to other Euro leagues where the technical level is quite a bit higher. Stay at Arsenal. Hone your skills and understanding of the game under one of best teachers of football around.
Arsenal have Ryo too, who is way better then Theo
Walcott is 1 of d best assets arsenal haf cos playing him results in d opposition 2 device tactics to neutralize him. He doesn’t even need 2 touch d ball. Wif him around d midfield of arsenal haf more space 2 operate in cos d opposition will b defending deep. I in my opinion reckon dat he’s naturally gifted as his pace is beyond contest in d Epl n cos he does nothing but still contributes much 2 arsenals game d way he influence d shape of d opposing team. Tis kid is also a big game player, he scores against the great big teams e.g. Barcelona, Manchesters……. Chelsea… Not many players cud do that. I Don think the ox is better then Walcott, incomparable. Ox is over hyped. Walcott impressed more wen he was ox”s age.
Hey there would you mind letting me know which web host you’re using?
I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and I must say this blog
loads a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good internet hosting
provider at a honest price? Many thanks, I appreciate it!